0.05/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.13/0.13	% Command    : run_portfolio.sh /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8NBII60Y6d
0.13/0.33	% Computer   : n006.cluster.edu
0.13/0.33	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.33	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.33	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.33	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 15:41:26 EDT 2021
0.13/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.33	% Running portfolio for 120 s
0.13/0.33	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.13/0.33	% Number of cores: 8
0.19/0.34	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.19/0.34	% Running in HO mode
0.50/0.61	% Estimated wc time : 1286
0.50/0.61	% Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 183.71428571428572
0.50/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/b.rpo.sh running for 21s
0.50/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/new_b3.2.norw.sh running for 15s
0.50/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/s6.ds.sh running for 10s
0.50/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/s6.sh running for 21s
0.50/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/c.s.2.sh running for 68s
0.50/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/c.easy.sh running for 26s
0.50/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/old_b3.avatar.sh running for 15s
16.00/2.90	% Solved by lams/new_b3.2.norw.sh.
16.00/2.90	% done 110 iterations in 2.151s
16.00/2.90	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
16.00/2.90	% SZS output start Refutation
16.00/2.90	tff(conj_0, axiom,
16.00/2.90	  (inj_on_a_b(f,
16.00/2.90	              sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(g,top_top_set_c),
16.00/2.90	                            image_c_a(h,top_top_set_c))))).
16.00/2.90	tff('0', plain,
16.00/2.90	     inj_on_a_b(f, 
16.00/2.90	       sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(g, top_top_set_c), 
16.00/2.90	         image_c_a(h, top_top_set_c))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [conj_0])).
16.00/2.90	tff(fact_136_sup__commute, axiom,
16.00/2.90	  (sup_sup_set_a = (^[X2:set_a,Y:set_a]: sup_sup_set_a(Y,X2)))).
16.00/2.90	tff('1', plain,
16.00/2.90	    sup_sup_set_a = (^[Y0 : set_a,Y1 : set_a]: sup_sup_set_a(Y1, Y0)),
16.00/2.90	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_136_sup__commute])).
16.00/2.90	tff('2', plain, sup_sup_set_a = ($C(sup_sup_set_a)),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lams2combs', [status(thm)], ['1'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('3', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : set_a, X2 : set_a]:
16.00/2.90	      sup_sup_set_a(X1, X2) = ($C(sup_sup_set_a, X1, X2)),
16.00/2.90	    inference('ho_complete_eq', [status(thm)], ['2'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('4', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : set_a, X2 : set_a]: sup_sup_set_a(X1, X2) = sup_sup_set_a(X2, X1),
16.00/2.90	    inference('comb-normalize', [status(thm)], ['3'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('5', plain,
16.00/2.90	     inj_on_a_b(f, 
16.00/2.90	       sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(h, top_top_set_c), 
16.00/2.90	         image_c_a(g, top_top_set_c))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('demod', [status(thm)], ['0', '4'])).
16.00/2.90	tff(fact_8_o__inj__on, axiom,
16.00/2.90	  (![F:((a > b)),G:((c > a)),H:((c > a))]:
16.00/2.90	     ((comp_a_b_c(F,G) = comp_a_b_c(F,H)) =>
16.00/2.90	      (inj_on_a_b(F,
16.00/2.90	                  sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(G,top_top_set_c),
16.00/2.90	                                image_c_a(H,top_top_set_c))) =>
16.00/2.90	       (G = H))))).
16.00/2.90	tff('6', plain,
16.00/2.90	     (!!((^[Y0 : a > b]:
16.00/2.90	            (!!((^[Y1 : c > a]:
16.00/2.90	                   (!!((^[Y2 : c > a]:
16.00/2.90	                          ((comp_a_b_c(Y0, Y1) = comp_a_b_c(Y0, Y2)) =>
16.00/2.90	                           (inj_on_a_b(Y0, 
16.00/2.90	                              sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(Y1, top_top_set_c), 
16.00/2.90	                                image_c_a(Y2, top_top_set_c))) =>
16.00/2.90	                            (Y1 = Y2)))))))))))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_8_o__inj__on])).
16.00/2.90	tff('7', plain,
16.00/2.90	     (!!(($B(!!, 
16.00/2.90	          ($B(($B(!!)), 
16.00/2.90	           ($S(($B(S, 
16.00/2.90	                ($B(($B(S)), 
16.00/2.90	                 ($B(($B(($B(=>)))), 
16.00/2.90	                  ($S(($B(C, ($B(($B(B)), ($B(($B(=)), comp_a_b_c)))))), 
16.00/2.90	                   comp_a_b_c)))))))), 
16.00/2.90	            ($C(($B(S, 
16.00/2.90	                 ($B(($B(S)), 
16.00/2.90	                  ($B(($B(($B(=>)))), 
16.00/2.90	                   ($C(($B(B, ($B(B, inj_on_a_b)))), 
16.00/2.90	                    ($C(($B(B, 
16.00/2.90	                         ($B(sup_sup_set_a, ($C(image_c_a, top_top_set_c)))))), 
16.00/2.90	                     ($C(image_c_a, top_top_set_c)))))))))))), 
16.00/2.90	             =)))))))))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lams2combs', [status(thm)], ['6'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('8', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : a > b]:
16.00/2.90	       (!!(($B(!!, 
16.00/2.90	            ($S(($B(S, 
16.00/2.90	                 ($B(($B(=>)), 
16.00/2.90	                  ($C(($B(B, ($B(=, comp_a_b_c(X1))))), comp_a_b_c(X1))))))), 
16.00/2.90	             ($S(($B(S, 
16.00/2.90	                  ($B(($B(=>)), 
16.00/2.90	                   ($B(($B(inj_on_a_b(X1))), 
16.00/2.90	                    ($C(($B(B, 
16.00/2.90	                         ($B(sup_sup_set_a, ($C(image_c_a, top_top_set_c)))))), 
16.00/2.90	                     ($C(image_c_a, top_top_set_c)))))))))), 
16.00/2.90	              =)))))))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['7'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('9', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : a > b, X2 : c > a]:
16.00/2.90	       (!!(($S(($B(=>, ($B((=(comp_a_b_c(X1, X2))), comp_a_b_c(X1))))), 
16.00/2.90	            ($S(($B(=>, 
16.00/2.90	                 ($B(inj_on_a_b(X1), 
16.00/2.90	                  ($B(sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(X2, top_top_set_c)), 
16.00/2.90	                   ($C(image_c_a, top_top_set_c)))))))), 
16.00/2.90	             (=(X2)))))))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['8'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('10', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : a > b, X2 : c > a, X3 : c > a]:
16.00/2.90	       ((comp_a_b_c(X1, X2) = comp_a_b_c(X1, X3)) =>
16.00/2.90	        (inj_on_a_b(X1, 
16.00/2.90	           sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(X2, top_top_set_c), 
16.00/2.90	             image_c_a(X3, top_top_set_c))) =>
16.00/2.90	         (X2 = X3))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['9'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('11', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : a > b, X2 : c > a, X3 : c > a]:
16.00/2.90	      (comp_a_b_c(X1, X2) != comp_a_b_c(X1, X3)
16.00/2.90	       |  (inj_on_a_b(X1, 
16.00/2.90	             sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(X2, top_top_set_c), 
16.00/2.90	               image_c_a(X3, top_top_set_c))) =>
16.00/2.90	           (X2 = X3))),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], ['10'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('12', plain,
16.00/2.90	    ![X1 : a > b, X2 : c > a, X3 : c > a]:
16.00/2.90	      (~ inj_on_a_b(X1, 
16.00/2.90	           sup_sup_set_a(image_c_a(X2, top_top_set_c), 
16.00/2.90	             image_c_a(X3, top_top_set_c)))
16.00/2.90	       | X2 = X3
16.00/2.90	       | comp_a_b_c(X1, X2) != comp_a_b_c(X1, X3)),
16.00/2.90	    inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], ['11'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('13', plain, (comp_a_b_c(f, h) != comp_a_b_c(f, g) | h = g),
16.00/2.90	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['5', '12'])).
16.00/2.90	tff(conj_1, axiom, (comp_a_b_c(f,g) = comp_a_b_c(f,h))).
16.00/2.90	tff('14', plain, comp_a_b_c(f, g) = comp_a_b_c(f, h),
16.00/2.90	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [conj_1])).
16.00/2.90	tff('15', plain, (comp_a_b_c(f, h) != comp_a_b_c(f, h) | h = g),
16.00/2.90	    inference('demod', [status(thm)], ['13', '14'])).
16.00/2.90	tff('16', plain, h = g, inference('simplify', [status(thm)], ['15'])).
16.00/2.90	tff(conj_2, conjecture, (g = h)).
16.00/2.90	tff(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (g != h)).
16.00/2.90	tff('17', plain, g != h, inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
16.00/2.90	tff('18', plain, $false,
16.00/2.90	    inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)], ['16', '17'])).
16.00/2.90	
16.00/2.90	% SZS output end Refutation
16.00/2.90	
16.00/2.90	
16.00/2.90	% Terminating...
16.58/3.04	% Runner terminated.
16.58/3.04	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
16.58/3.04	EOF